Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 13:37

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why You Should Stop Texting On Your iPhone Or Android Phone - Forbes
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why do people believe that global warming is man made?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump administration prepares to ease big bank rules - Politico
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
'Lilo & Stitch' and 'Hawaii Five-O' actor David Hekili Kenui Bell dies at 57 - Entertainment Weekly
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
'AI Godfather' Warns Superintelligent Machines Could Kill Off Humans With Biowarfare - Decrypt
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Democrats be honest, how many of you were wishing that Musk rescue space flight blew up?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
JWST captures its most extreme gravitational lens ever - Big Think